Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE
Date
Msg-id 200412020408.iB248Tl16515@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, that's wrong: if there is a pending SIGPIPE that belongs to the
> >> outer app, you'd clear it.
>
> > True, but I documented that in the patch.
>
> A documented bug is still a bug.  The entire point of this change is to
> not interfere with the behavior of the surrounding app, at least not
> more than we absolutely have to; and we do not have to clear SIGPIPEs
> that are certainly not ours.

I am working on a new version that doesn't have this problem.  Will post
soon.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Update for documentation on CVS