Troels Arvin wrote:
> We have tried to use the official[1] short names:
> SQL-92
> SQL:1999
> SQL:2003
I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to
"ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.
> Note 1:
> http://books.elsevier.com/mk/default.asp?isbn=1558604561 has a
> section on this subject.
Note that this book is titled "SQL 1999 - Understanding Relational
Language Components". Apparently, they are not sure either.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
