On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> No you can not, but the tracker isn't very resource intesive from my past
> experience. I can host it if needed.
It wasn't that that I was thinking of ... just wondering if there was some
way of having it redundant, instead of centralized ... nice thing about
ftp mirrors, we have about 60 of them, so if one goes down, it doesn't
really affect anything ... from what everyone is saying, if the tracker
goes down, it affects everything ... seems odd to have "new technology"
still having single points of failure :(
> > Gavin >
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>>
>>> Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...so the very first client is the real server
>>>> that must be run 24/24.
>>>>
>>> I don't think this is correct. You need a tracker for downloaders to be
>>> able to find each other but no client is more important than the others.
>>
>>
>> can there be multiple trackers? for instance, if we ran bt.postgresql.org
>> on two different servers, could they both run trackers at the same time?
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>> Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
