Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Constantin Teodorescu |
---|---|
Subject | Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200411220736.iAM7akZ2008229@corbeanca.iqm.ro Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
<div class="Section1"><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">Hello to everybody again,</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">thought you didn’t hear any news from me for a very long time, the news are good </span></font><font face="Wingdings"size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Wingdings">J</span></font><font face="Arial" size="2"><spanstyle="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"></span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><spanstyle="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">I’m still here and promoting PostgreSQL.</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><spanstyle="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">I am involved in the developing of a big romanian project for the vets that will put Linux & PostgreSQLon 3500 computers in the whole country, linked together with dial-up connections that will keep track of the animalmovements.</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">The central database (also PostgreSLQ) will hold billions of records with animal events (births, movements,slaughter and so on) and my question is:</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">If I will choose to keep a mirror of every workstation database in a separate schema in the central databasethat mean that I will have 3500 different schemas.</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><spanstyle="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">Is there any limit or any barrier that could stop this kind of approach or make things go slower?</span></font><pclass="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">Constantin Teodorescu</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">Ancient PgAccess developer</span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial">P.S. Please Cc: me at <a href="mailto:teo@flex.ro">teo@flex.ro</a></span></font><p class="MsoNormal"><fontface="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial"> </span></font></div>
pgsql-hackers by date: