On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Who's "we"? I don't recall a spec document anywhere that says that the
> design has to be "stretchy", nor do I recall any discussion on this list
> to that effect. Maybe my memory is faulty, give me a link.
Actually, fixed width has been something that has been avoided as far as
design is concerned since day one ... I even seem to recall a whole thread
on it, since some like the whole 'fixed width' perspective (me included),
while others like the 'use up what you can of my browser' design ...
> 1) Omar's design is undeniably better-looking and easier to navigate
> than Lucasz's;
Can someone re-post Omar's design? Make it easier to compare :) The only
thing I recall missing from it was the banner on the top of the right
menu ...
> 2) Porting to Omar's design rather than Lucasz's will make no difference in
> the go-live time of the web site;
Actually, isn't Lucasz's design already what is live on wwwdevel? I'm not
100% sure what the hold up on getting things live is ... but looking at
wwwdevel, it all looks to be there ...
> No, it's a vote on what we want Omar and others to work on; patching
> Lucasz's design or porting to his own. I vote the latter -- unless, of
> course, you want to argue the 3 points above.
The only thing the CFV missed, I believe, was links to the two design to
make the determination ... I just don't remember Omar's design anymore :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
