On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:28:12PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Externally, everybody thinks that there should be just one, just like
> there is for other databases.
I guess it's this thing that I want to understand. Why do people
believe that? Because other databases, where "other" are "the ones
I'd actually run important systems on" _don't_ have just one.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
