On Monday November 8 2004 7:24, Ed L. wrote:
> On Monday November 8 2004 6:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> > > A power failure led to failed postmaster restart using 7.4.6 (see
> > > output below). The short-term fix is usually to delete the pid file
> > > and restart.
> > >
> > > I often wonder why ipcs never seems to show the shared memory
> > > block in question?
> >
> > The shared memory block would certainly not still exist after a system
> > reboot, so what we have here is a misleading error message. Looking at
> > the code, the most plausible explanation appears to be that
> > shmctl(IPC_STAT) is failing (which it ought to) and returning some
> > errno code different from EINVAL (which is the case we are expecting to
> > see). What platform are you on, and what does its shmctl(2) man page
> > document as error conditions?
>
> Platform is Linux 2.4.20-30.9 on i686 (Pentium 4, I think).
I recently saw this same thing happen from a power failure on several HPUX
boxes as well (I think running B.11.00/11.23 with 7.3.4/7.3.7, but not
sure).
Ed
