Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Date
Msg-id 20041103202103.B82047@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-www
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Justin Clift wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Do a vacuum full analyze on the two databases being called, and load time
>>> went from 2.4sec to .46sec:
>>
>>
>> Hmmmm, is there any chance your Free Space Map settings aren't high enough?
>>
>
> I could be wrong but my understanding is that pg_autovacuum won't vacuum
> system tables so eventually you still need to perform a full vacuum (not
> neccessarily a vacuum full).
>
> Could this be the issue?

I just setup a weekly cron to do a vacuum full ... I didn't realize that
pg_autovacuum didn't catch it all, except, of course, I should have clued
in when we had that fun with the banner database, where an index on a 12
row table was faster then no index :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org