pgsql: In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Subject pgsql: In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock
Date
Msg-id 20041025154202.D12373A4136@svr1.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock on
the parent table, it's essential that all index accesses take some kind
of lock on the index.  I had missed vacuumlazy.c :-( ...

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/commands:
        vacuumlazy.c (r1.47 -> r1.48)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c.diff?r1=1.47&r2=1.48)

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: dpage@pgfoundry.org (User Dpage)
Date:
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Version number bump.
Next
From: tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Make heap_fetch API more consistent by having the buffer remain