Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Date
Msg-id 200410211016.25093.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim,

> Yes, but using overloading to implement defaults is a pain. Imagine how
> much you need to overload to have 5 default arguments; that equates to 4
> stub functions/prodecudes. In the case of adding a single parameter it's
> not that bad, but it becomes very onerous if you're trying to provide
> default values for a bunch of parameters.

See follow-up discussion regarding ambiguity within overloading schemes.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Bjorklund
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Why frequently updated tables are an issue