Re: NIC to NIC connection - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: NIC to NIC connection
Date
Msg-id 20041019220133.GA2957@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NIC to NIC connection  ("Matt Clark" <matt@ymogen.net>)
Responses Re: NIC to NIC connection
Re: NIC to NIC connection
List pgsql-admin
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 17:37:43 +0100,
  Matt Clark <matt@ymogen.net> wrote:
> You would assign a different subnet to the connection, and then tell the
> servers to connect to the PG server's address on that subnet.  No other
> changes required.  Very odd setup though.  If you want a 'private'
> connection then use a switch, rather than needing umpty NICs in the PG
> server.

Switches are not security devices. While it is harder to sniff packets on
switches, you can't count on them to prevent hostile machines on the
switch from playing games with the arp protocol. Also I believe that if
a switch doesn't remember where a particular mac address is it will send
the packet to all of the attached ports.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql database .1 .2 .3 file names
Next
From: Matt Clark
Date:
Subject: Re: NIC to NIC connection