Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...
Date
Msg-id 200410151338.17277.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...
List pgsql-performance
Tom,

> I suspect the reason recalc_sigpending_tsk is so high is that the
> original coding of PG_TRY involved saving and restoring the signal mask,
> which led to a whole lot of sigsetmask-type kernel calls.  Is this test
> with beta3, or something older?

Beta3, *without* Gavin or Neil's Futex patch.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...
Next
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: Re: mmap (was First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ...