Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating
Date
Msg-id 200410150324.i9F3Owt21113@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-docs
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>   There are three major standards: SQL-92, SQL:1999, and SQL:2003.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Actually, they are just different versions of the single major standard.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Wording suggestion?
> >
> >
>
> There is only one current standard SQL:2003 correct? The rest are
> considered deprecated?

I don't think so.  Some database say they are SQL99-compliant while not
SQL-2003 compliant.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating