Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch
Date
Msg-id 200410091916.26217.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Notes on config-file-locations patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Notes on config-file-locations patch
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> The main difference between this and the CVS-tip behavior is that
> if you want to specify the main config file directly, you write
> --config_file instead of -D.  I think that's less confusing than
> overloading -D with multiple meanings.

I seem to recall that this was proposed all along (with the option named 
-C), before it was torn apart and reassembled.  I'm happy with it.

> It wasn't clear to me whether we had a consensus to prevent
> non-superusers from reading the values of these GUC variables.

I think in general operating system details should be hidden from users.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Security implications of config-file-location patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1