Re: flattened tables with normalized tables - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Fuhr
Subject Re: flattened tables with normalized tables
Date
Msg-id 20041008043550.GA49182@winnie.fuhr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: flattened tables with normalized tables  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>)
Responses Re: flattened tables with normalized tables  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>)
Re: flattened tables with normalized tables  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:08:18PM -0700, Dennis Gearon wrote:
>
> About regular views, how does that speed things up, other than the initial
> SQL interpretation of the view not needing to be done?

I didn't mean to imply that views would speed things up -- I was
merely suggesting them as an alternative to your "flattened table"
if part of its purpose would be to simplify queries.  You might
want to perform some experiments to see if the performance gains
from a materialized view are worth the extra complexity.

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Net Virtual Mailing Lists"
Date:
Subject: Re: Index problem.... GIST (tsearch2)
Next
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: flattened tables with normalized tables