On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:55:21PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> While we're discussing things that will possibly mean a different system
> than the current function language, I have another request: Can we have
> a means of defining procedures/functions that doesn't involve using
> quotes? Having to double-quote everything is extremely annoying and
> prone to errors. I realize that even if procedures/functions aren't
> defined using quotes there will still be cases where things need to be
> multi-quoted, but those cases are much rarer.
So you aren't aware of the dollar-quoting feature? You may want to take
a look at that ...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Limítate a mirar... y algun día veras"
