On Monday September 20 2004 5:45, Ed L. wrote:
> On Monday September 20 2004 5:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> > > + /*
> > > + * We expect a strftime(%z) result of the form "[+-]HHMM"
> > > according to + * RFC822-conformant dates, where HH:MM is the
> > > unsigned UTC offset. + * If we don't get it, just return zero
> > > offset, and let the logs + * rotate on UTC time boundaries.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + count = strftime(msg, 6, "%z", localtime(&now));
> >
> > That might work for you, but it's not portable.
Do you consider pg_tm.tm_gmtoff reliable and portable from
pg_localtime(&now)?
Ed