On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, John Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>> Aha, got that. I don't know such syntax and not sure if
>> it's well supported.
>>> I know about <NOINDEX>.....</NOINDEX> by atomz.com, though
>>
>> Does Google have an equivalent that they honor?
>>
>
> I've asked google, and their reply was consistent with the information
> available on their website. Google does not allow cloaking, and any
> attempt to do so, will result in a permanent ban.
>
> They define cloaking as presenting different content to search engines
> as to what regular visitors see.
Guess they don't check often then since we've been doing it for months now
:)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664