Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
Date
Msg-id 200408300059.38871.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sunday 29 August 2004 18:29, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> > On the ordering issues, I'd go for straight alphabetical schema/name
> > sort in all cases; I thought that's where we were already, but if you
> > see some missing cases let's fix it.  I'm not enamored of discriminating
> > against system objects in the sort order.
>
> I don't agree with this. We already discriminate against system objects by
> not showing system tables, for example, when doing a \dt. There is no
> reason I should have to scroll through 1500+ system functions using \df
> because I forgot the name of one of the 12 functions I've created, or
> simply because I want to view all 12 quickly.

On the one hand I would have to agree with Greg, and I would point out that by 
default in phppgadmin we don't display system functions since it is just too 
overbearing. 

OTOH I know that I sometimes use /df to look up built in functions that I 
don't exactly remember, so keeping a way to access the system functions is 
handy. 

Given a third hand I'd look for some way to do both... perhaps \df can show 
all functions and \df- can show only user created functions?

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] server crash in very big transaction [postgresql
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates