Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> You are confusing SQL and PL/pgSQL.
>
> > Any idea why they don't match between SQL and PL/pgSQL.
>
> Different lexers.
>
> We could talk about extending plpgsql's lexer to handle comments the
> same way as the main SQL lexer, but it doesn't do so ATM. (Also, there
> is compatibility with Oracle PL/SQL to think about before assuming such
> a change must be a Good Thing...)
Yea, I was wondering about PL/SQL compatibility. Someone want to
research that?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073