I think I missed this in the earlier patches, but does the alter table syntax
still work for indexes in addition to the new syntax?
On Saturday 21 August 2004 22:47, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Here is a change to the alter_table regression test to use ALTER INDEX ...
> RENAME instead of ALTER TABLE ... RENAME in the case of an index renaming.
> Its probably not the right place for it, but I'm not sure where is the
> right place for it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gavin
>
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> > > Thanks for spotting this sloppy work. Basically, I cropped my diff
> > > because there was lots of unrelated code in the work space. But I was a
> > > little too hard and culled allfiles.sgml, alter.c, equal/copyfuncs.c
> > > and analyze.c.
> >
> > I was wondering if something like that might have happened --- I know
> > you know better on all these points ;-)
> >
> > > I was getting together a patch against HEAD but I just noticed that you
> > > fixed this. Thanks.
> >
> > Yeah, I think everything is fixed in CVS tip. Let me know if there was
> > anything I missed.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
> >
> >
> > !DSPAM:4127e64e43221930617052!
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
