Re: to_char() and negative intervals - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: to_char() and negative intervals
Date
Msg-id 200408162259.i7GMxOC03288@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: to_char() and negative intervals  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Responses Re: to_char() and negative intervals  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Added to open items:
* remove to_char(interval) if we initdb


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:43:10AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Karel Zak wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 12:24:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > > Someone on IRC just reported this to_char() failure with negative
> > > > > intervals:
> > > > 
> > > > I think Karel wanted to remove to_char(interval) altogether.
> > > 
> > >  Yes, the notice about it is already in 7.4 docs. Maybe we can remove
> > >  it in 7.5/8.0. Comments?
> > 
> > I don't see how we can remove it in 8.0 unless we require an initdb. 
> > What we could do is to throw an error/warning in the code and remove it
> > completely in 8.1.
> 
> If we force an initdb for some other reason during beta, we can remove
> to_char(interval) at that point too ...
> 
> -- 
> Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
> "Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra est? seca" (Orual)
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pulling projection up in plans