Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200408130306.i7D36k428832@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Responses |
Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Do you want any of these added to the TODO? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > And I forgot to add: > > * Allow dumping/restoring of any number of specific objects and types > > Chris > > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > OK, everything for pg_dump TODO I can think of: > > > > pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore > > > > * Add dumping of comments on composite type columns > > * Add dumping of comments on index columns > > * Replace crude DELETE FROM way of dumping cleaning of users and groups > > with separate DROP commands > > * Add dumping and restoring of LOB comments > > * Stop dumping CASCADE on DROP TYPE commands in clean mode > > * Add full object name to the tag field. eg. for operators we need > > '=(integer, integer)', instead of just '='. > > * Add pg_dumpall custom format dumps. This is probably best done by: > > * Combining pg_dump and pg_dumpall into a single binary > > * Export to other database (eg. Oracle, MySQL and DB2) formats > > > > I'm hopefully getting the first 4 in for 8.0 release... The full names > > in tags one should be done really as well at some point. > > > > Anyone got anything else? > > > > Chris > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >> Yes, shoot over that the section should contain. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >> > >>> Perhaps. I was also thinking that maybe it's time to combine > >>> pg_dumpall and pg_dump into a single utility. At the moment, I can't > >>> see how pg_dumpall can ever have a -Fc option, since it will be messy > >>> to interact with the pg_dump processes. > >>> > >>> I was thinking a pg_export utility that can output to a range of > >>> other databases SQL formats would also be a good idea. It would > >>> share about 90% of the pg_dump code, but I'm trying to think of how > >>> to avoid duplicating the code. > >>> > >>> How about we have a whole pg_dump/dumpall/restore/backup section in > >>> the TODO file? > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> TODO item? > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until > >>>>>>> August > >>>>>>> 9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If > >>>>>>> not it > >>>>>>> can wait until the next major release. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It can wait --- it was submitted after feature freeze anyway, and we > >>>>>> certainly have more than enough other things to do in the next > >>>>>> couple days. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I have a plan to allow pg_dump to dump any object in the next > >>>>> version - i suspect these two ideas will need reconciliation. > >>>>> > >>>>> Chris > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
pgsql-hackers by date: