Re: Open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Open items
Date
Msg-id 20040806125459.V80911@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Hrmmm, stupid question here, but why not just change hte postgresql.conf
>> to be those variables that *are* changed from the default, with a simple
>> comment pointing to the documention for the rest?  the benefit of that is
>> that at lesat the documentation has fuller descriptions of what the
>> variables are for ...
>>
>> *that* could be easily done after beta ...
>
> Not sure why removing the comments is seen as good myself, but I think
> the idea was that if you comment out something and change the default,
> you assume that commenting it out returns it to the default, though it
> does not.

'k, now you've totally confused me ... if you comment something out, and 
it doesn't return to the default, where does it go to?

my understanding was that the 'beef' was that the defaults that are 
displayed on each of the variables in postgresql.conf file don't 
necessarily match the defaults compiled into the backend ... which, I 
*think* is what you meant in the above? :)

Right now, if you install postgresql, there are various variables 
added/set in the postgresql.conf file (notably the stuff that Tom did with 
the shared memory buffer) ... with the rest being "what could be the 
default, but may not be" for the commented out variables ... my suggestion 
is to remove the commented out variables altogether, and change the file 
to something like:

#
# for a complete list of GUC variables, see ...
#
<put 'live/set' variables here>


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgxs: build infrastructure for extensions v4
Next
From: Ned Lilly
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as an application server