Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut said:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I doubt it. People can always just read the file to see what
> >> settings are in it, and it's not like nonexperts are going to have a
> >> variety of different configurations that we're gonna have to ask them
> >> about. (Even in the Unix world, pg_config is not really needed when
> >> most people are installing one of a small number of RPM-type
> >> packages...)
>
> ISTM that if it's not useful we should rip it out and if it is then we
> should make it portable.
Agreed. Right now we have a shell script in the Win32 binary directory
that doesn't work for them.
> > The point of pg_config is not primarily to debug the installation
> > layout for us. pg_config is used in configure scripts to find
> > PostgreSQL libraries and header files.
>
> To that extent is it not broken by relocated installations that we have now
> made some provision for?
Good question.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
