Re: ODBC Developers - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: ODBC Developers
Date
Msg-id 200407172305.24496.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ODBC Developers  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-odbc
Dave Page wrote:
> Which makes me think - should we add or remove placeholders for
> unimplemented functions? The important thing is that SQLGetFunctions
> is correct of course, however we should be consistent. I'm kinda on
> the fence about which way to go on that one. On one had the
> placeholders are useful reminders that work needs to be done - on the
> other, they do add to the code needlessly.

I would leave it as is.  As long as the fraction of placeholders
compared to the implemented functions is low, it's not really a
problem.

What could be useful is a TODO file listing missing functions and other
issues.

> convert.c should (imho) make odbc.sql obsolete as much as possible.

I've fixed a few bugs in convert.c and verified all the functions.
odbc.sql is obsolete and removed.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Note on libtool
Next
From: "David P. Lurie"
Date:
Subject: error with access 2003 - column "ctid" does not exist