Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
> > Right. We already have to use shared mem for the backends and
> > postmaster. It is the logger we are worried about.
> >
> > Tom brought up the point that if the logger used shared memory, we would
> > have to kill/restart it if we need to reinitialize shared memory,
>
> I don't know why that particular segment should ever be renewed. Anyway,
> it's gone.
As I remember, we have one big shared memory segment. Where you
creating a special one just for this timestamp? If you were, I see why
your approach was safer, but as you said, it doesn't buy us much anyway.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
