Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:18, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>
> Thanks for the vote of confidence, on or off list.
>
> > too many people spend a lot of
> > money for proprietary databases, just for some missing features in
> > PostgreSQL
>
> Agreed - PITR isn't aimed at existing users of PostgreSQL. If you use it
> already, even though it doesn't have it, then you are quite likely to be
> able to keep going without it.
>
> Most commercial users won't touch anything that doesn't have PITR.
Agreed. I am surprised at how few requests we have gotten for PITR. I
assume people are either using replication or not considering us.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
