However, based on our feature freeze, maybe what we have now is fine and
I can just add the TODO item again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> >> Sequences are too small to be worth moving around, and may someday be
> >> reimplemented in a fashion that doesn't use up a separate disk file for
> >> each one. If we allow SET TABLESPACE on them we will be limiting our
> >> future flexibility for no useful gain.
>
> > Why do we allow them to be created in tablespaces in the first place
> > then? Seems like a bit of a misfeature? I mean we don't allow views in
> > tablespaces...
>
> I had forgotten that the original patch allowed that. Personally I'd
> vote for taking it out, for the above-stated reasons --- any objections?
>
> If people do want to have it then we can instead change ALTER SET
> TABLESPACE to allow sequences; but we'd also need a nontrivial addition
> to pg_dump, so there had better be a better reason than "might be nice
> to have".
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
