Re: client_min_messages in dumps? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: client_min_messages in dumps?
Date
Msg-id 200407112150.i6BLoBS05747@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: client_min_messages in dumps?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I also don't see LOG used much in the code at all.  It seems to be used
> > mostly by VACUUM and ANALYZE.  Seems something is wrong.
> 
> There is nothing wrong except that you've forgotten how we designed
> VACUUM VERBOSE to work with the new logging-levels stuff... that is
> basically what INFO is for.
> 

OK, it turns out only postgresql.conf was wrong about mentioning INFO as
a proper client_min_messages level.  The SGML docs didn't mention it as
a value.

Added to TODO:
* Add NOVICE output level for helpful messages like automatic  sequence/index creation

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl (7.5)
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All