Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32
Date
Msg-id 200407100132.i6A1WKU17000@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >> But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for
> >> corruptions.
>
> > Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon.
>
> Has this been agreed to by the win32-hackers list?  My recollection is
> that there was still considerable disagreement about the appropriate
> way to deal with this issue.

Yes, we resolved that by doing proper locking (3 weeks ago), but it
turns out the code wasn't 100% proper and this fixes it.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PgSQL 7.4.2 - NaN on Tru64 UNIX