Re: Nested Transaction TODO list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
Date
Msg-id 20040703212240.GA4323@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Nested Transaction TODO list  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:03:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> Why does postgres.c discriminate against START TRANSACTION where it
> now allows BEGIN?  Could simplify code by just allowing all
> TransactionStmt types.

Why does START have a different Node from BEGIN anyway?  This seems to
be a leftover from when people thought they should behave differently.
They are the same now, so there's no point in distinguishing them, or is it?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Saca el libro que tu religión considere como el indicado para encontrar la
oración que traiga paz a tu alma. Luego rebootea el computador
y ve si funciona" (Carlos Duclós)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen"
Date:
Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list