Re: Possible bug? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Possible bug?
Date
Msg-id 200407021556.18554.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Possible bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Am Donnerstag, 1. Juli 2004 23:10 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Right.  The reason PG doesn't error is that we have an implicit cast
> from integer to text.  I've opined before that we should mark most
> cross-type-category casts as explicit-only ... they are just too prone
> to give unexpected answers, as in this case.

It seems we're just opining in circles.  Why not do it?  Is anyone objecting?

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp arithmetic (a possible bug?)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Grant Update (Possible bug)?