Re: Postgres IDENT auth problems... - Mailing list pgsql-admin
| From | Jens Porup |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Postgres IDENT auth problems... |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 20040701054614.GB9047@vanilla.office.cyber.com.au Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Postgres IDENT auth problems... (Jens Porup <jens@cyber.com.au>) |
| Responses |
Re: Postgres IDENT auth problems...
|
| List | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 11:33:04PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 21:38, Jens Porup wrote:
>
> > The request tracker database setup script dies trying to connect to
> > the database:
> >
> > DBI connect('dbname=template1;host=localhost','rtuser',...) failed: could not
> > connect to server: Connection refused at /usr/sbin/rt-setup-database line 110
> >
<snip>
> >
> > Now before you ask:
> >
> > Yes, the following lines appear uncommented in my
> > /etc/postgresql/postgresql.conf:
> >
> > tcpip_socket = true
> > port = 5432
> >
> > But then:
> >
> > root@request-tracker:~# netstat -auntp
> >
> > shows postmaster running on a udp port???
> >
> > udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:1042 127.0.0.1:1042 ESTABLISHED18375/postmaster
> >
>
> But can you nmap it? And that's not the right default port 5432...
> Maybe it's some new feature I'm familiar with, or you've changed it.
Trust me, I am a postgres newbie... I'm not trying to do anything but a *very*
ordinary install!
>
> What does nmap <ip> show?
root@request-tracker:~# nmap localhost
Starting nmap 3.50 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-07-01 15:39 EST
Interesting ports on localhost (127.0.0.1):
(The 1654 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
80/tcp open http
113/tcp open auth
515/tcp open printer
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.735 seconds
root@request-tracker:~#
> > A server restart shows:
> >
> > root@request-tracker:~# /etc/init.d/postgresql restart
> > Stopping PostgreSQL database server: autovacuumNo pg_autovacuum found running;
> > none killed.
> > postmaster.
> > Starting PostgreSQL database server: postmaster autovacuum.
>
> Sounds like a firewall to me.
>
My colleague here at work who built the user mode linux image I'm using
(the virtual "box") assures me there's no firewall installed.... how
would I check if there were?
> > And finally, I *do* have lines in my pg_hba.conf file (and yes, in the correct
> > order) to allow my user 'rtuser' to connect to template1:
> >
>
> Yeah, you'd see it as a different error, one about not having permission
> to connect, like:
>
> psql: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host "10.0.0.2", user "postgres",
> database "postgres", SSL off
Well, that helps eliminate one possibility anyway. Any more ideas?
Thanks,
Jens
>
> Hope that helps.
pgsql-admin by date: