Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Date
Msg-id 20040617184549.GB3665@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > My personal conjecture:
> >
> > The "extended insert" is not on the Postgres TODO list because:
> > a) It's not ANSI SQL standard.
> > b) We have COPY, which is better.
>
> Unfortunately that statement is mostly wrong:
> - It is on the TODO list.
> - It is standard.
> - It is better than COPY.

Why is it better than COPY?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"No renuncies a nada. No te aferres a nada."


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum