Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So? I don't follow why "run it as a service" isn't a sufficient answer,
> >> and indeed the preferred way to do it.
>
> > We don't know what the usage pattern is going to be on Windows - I think
> > we need to keep it as flexible as possible consistent with good
> > security.
>
> Sure, but I draw the line at running Postgres with admin privileges.
> "Flexibility is more important than security" is exactly the mindset
> that has gotten Microsoft into their current bed of nails.
Easy of use is also one of the reaons MS is so popular and on so many
computers. I am not advocating we allow unsecure usage, but I am
pointing out that security and easy of use are important.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
