Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Uh, why worry? If you had an application that depended in any way
> > shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ...
>
> Wasn't it a pg_upgrade consideration or something?
No. The issue was having applications hard-code type oids for
performance reasons.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073