Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Paul Thomas
Subject Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals
Date
Msg-id 20040602142721.A432@bacon
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals  (Jan Heise <jan@janheise.de>)
Responses Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals
List pgsql-jdbc
On 02/06/2004 12:47 Jan Heise wrote:
> oliver, thanks for your reply.
>
> the db in question is a 7.4 site in production. upgrading to another
> version is not really what i'd like
> to do. the explicit cast is problematic too, i'm using hibernate as my
> orm. unless i missed something
> in the docs, i can not add the cast to the config - but this is sth. for
> the hibernate forums.
>
> the problem is a special case where i have to load objects from the
> table in question by the pk
> (details would be quite long, but i can not change the table-structure
> at this time). table size is
> approx. 120 million rows and approx 2 million rows have a pk < INT4_MAX.
> so i think my only
> option is dropping the foreign keys, making the pks and all references
> bigger than INT4_MAX
> and recreate the fk.
>
> jan

There's an unofficial patch:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2003-09/msg00143.php

which might solve your problems for now. IIRC, there's a server-side patch
been submitted which will solve the int4/int8 issue and may be 7.5.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business             |
| Computer Consultants         |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk   |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Jan Heise
Date:
Subject: Re: int4/int8 problem with jdbc was Re: "Fix" for INT8 literals
Next
From: Manuel Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Column quoting in result set getters