Re: Fast index build vs. PITR - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Fast index build vs. PITR
Date
Msg-id 200406012017.i51KHDw25591@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fast index build vs. PITR  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > I'm not clear that building from WAL is really going to be that much faster.
> > A) algorithmically it's only the factor of log(n) that you're talking about.
> > and B) the WAL will have records for every write, not just the final product,
> > so it might potentially have a lot more writes to do.
> 
> Wrong ... what we log in WAL for a btree index build is just the series
> of completed index page images.  Recreation of the index would proceed
> at whatever your disk read/write bandwidth is.
> 
> Like Alvaro, I suspect that people who are using PITR will be concerned
> about recovery time, and would not be thrilled with any scenario that
> involves REINDEX to get the system back on its feet.

Agreed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast index build vs. PITR