Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dan Langille
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Date
Msg-id 20040520160705.R64060@xeon.unixathome.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Robert Treat wrote:

> One potential issue with PostgreSQL and big databases would be
> upgrades and backups, which require dumping lots of data to disk which
> can be inconvenient. If I were a big company looking to switch to
> postgresql, I'd think hard about using some of the money I saved in
> license fee's to get in place upgrades developed.

This is an issue frequently raised with Bacula (http://www.bacula.org/).
How do I backup my 20GB database if I have only 1GB free diskspace?
Bacula can use a FIFO, although I've never used it myself.

--
Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL