On Mon, 17 May 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > plPHP and plPerlNG both belong on pgfoundry, not in the core distribution
> > ...
>
> Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is supposed to
> replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that (as
> long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate plPHP???
That is the plan ... unless someone knows a reason why they can't be built
independently of the core? ecpg relies on the grammar files in core, but
as far as I knew (please correct me if I'm wrong) the pls only rely on
headers and libraries that get installed ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
