On Friday May 7 2004 12:20, Ed L. wrote:
>
> 1) I'm inclined to set this to handle as large a DB footprint as will be
> in the coming year or two, so maybe 3X what it is now. What is the
> impact/cost of setting max_fsm_pages at, say, 3M for an 8GB footprint?
> (3 x 8GB/8K)
Ok, so I see 40B per, so setting it to 3M ==> 3M * 40 = 120MB of additional
RAM usage for this? Any other impacts with which to be concerned?
