Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> No, this is running with the patch that suppresses that. Basically, for
> some reason that I have been unable to find, and which leaves no log
> trace, copy just stops after about 4 or 5 lines, and then there are a
> bunch of consequent failures. I can't account for it yet. All I do know is
> that it happens when the tests are run with high parallelism and doesn't
> with no or low parallelism.
Not surprising. We expect to have these problems with such a new port.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
