Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Date
Msg-id 200405050402.i4542Er23789@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > I remember going through this.  Other backends will use pg_subtrans to
> > know what transactions are in progress. They have to do the standard
> > lookups to find the status of the parent transaction.  The backend-local
> > list of xids is needed so the commit can clean up those subtransaction
> > xids so that later transactions don't have to use pg_subtrans.
> 
> Is there some solution whereby the common case (99.999% of transactions 
> won't be subtransactoins) is fast, and the uncommon case of being in a 
> subtransaction is slower?

Yes, we use an unreserved clog status to indicate a pg_subtrans lookup
is required.  In non-subtrans cases, no pg_subtrans lookup is required.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?