Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date
Msg-id 20040430015713.H45839@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:

> And if we always set deadlines independent of the required development
> time, then we may never get a win32 port or any other major feature that
> takes a little more time and attention.

Actually, that one doesn't hold ... it just means that we need to mature
our development environments to match the larger projects that need to
happen ... we are using CVS, there is nothing that stops a side-branch
being started, like we did with the Win32 stuff and then merging it back
up when the feature is ready ..

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Next
From: zhuangjifeng
Date:
Subject: How does postgres remain the unique index unique?