Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date
Msg-id 20040430011641.Q45839@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > I guess my point is really "do you want to freeze on June 1 if *none* of
> > > these features are done?"
> >
> > No, I agree that that would be foolish ... but there has also been alot
> > done on the code over the past few months that even *one* of those
> > features should be enough to put it over the top ...
>
> But we should have at least one done before setting a freeze date, and
> the freeze date should be one month in the future.  Right now we have
> none.

Now, that logic *doesn't* follow ... freeze date == that one feature makes
more sense ... or freeze date == one month from May 1st *or* one feature,
whichever is longer makes sense ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion