Re: Basic subtransaction facility - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Date
Msg-id 20040429200533.GH4503@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Basic subtransaction facility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:42:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> In general I tend to agree with Manfred's point: if you have reason to
> suspect global corruption of a backend's state then you should do FATAL
> (or possibly PANIC).  If you do not suspect this then you ought to just
> ERROR.  I do not see the use-case for abort-all-levels-of-xact-but-
> don't-exit.

Ok, I'm not wedded to the idea of a new elevel.  So you think
elog(ERROR) should rather be elog(FATAL) ?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Y una voz del caos me habló y me dijo
"Sonríe y sé feliz, podría ser peor".
Y sonreí. Y fui feliz.
Y fue peor.

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic subtransaction facility
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic subtransaction facility