Re: Why will vacuum not end? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Why will vacuum not end?
Date
Msg-id 200404241849.07896.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why will vacuum not end?  ("Shea,Dan [CIS]" <Dan.Shea@ec.gc.ca>)
List pgsql-performance
Dan,

> There were defintely 219,177,133 deletions.
> The deletions are most likely from the beginning, it was based on the
> reception_time of the data.

You need to run VACUUM more often, I think.    Vacuuming out 219 million dead
tuples is going to take a long time no matter how you look at it.   If you
vacuum more often, presumably there will be less for Vacuum to do each time.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: Why will vacuum not end?
Next
From: Andrew McMillan
Date:
Subject: Re: Wierd context-switching issue on Xeon patch for 7.4.1