Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore
Date
Msg-id 200404222350.13887.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 16:54, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> g a data store for many databases, not a single database.  But I
> >> think it is far too sanctified by history to change now, just as Ken
> >> Thompson now wishes he had put an 'e' on the end of 'creat' but can't
> >> go back and fix it. Maybe we should think about a symlink/hardlink to
> >> use a better name.
> >
> > initcatalog?
>
> initpgstore ... we can play the name game if people are serious :-)
>

ooh... we havent done this is a while.... hows about....

initpgdata? 

dovetails nicely with PGDATA... at least until that gets deprecated ;-)

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions