Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 200404211817.i3LIHa102766@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Taking into account that quite a few people have repeatedly stated that 
> the components in contrib are considered more supported/recommended than 
> similar solutions found on gborg or any other external site, I suggest 
> we move the projects dbmirror and dblink to gborg. The rserv contrib 
> module seems to me to be an early Perl prototype of erserver, nobody is 
> working on any more. I suggest we drop that entirely.
> 
> Comments/alternatives?

Agreed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: valgrind errors